I’m not doing NaNoWriMo. I’ve written it off. Have done so for several years. I write all the time. I don’t need a month to remind me to write. Certainly, others might find camaraderie in the process and motivation in the mark of a month. That’s great. It’s not for me.
Much of this now feels contrived, commercializing writing, a calculated reason for workshops and seminars and implies writing rules and boxing people in. You don’t have to agree with me. Maybe you think I’m too harsh. I’m cool with that and I respect it if NaNoWriMo somehow helps you produce work. But for me, you either write or you don’t and you don’t need a weekend to throw a party.
What NaNoWriMo has done for me is this: Remind me of a piece I wrote last November about how to dismiss any of the so-called rules of writing, including some preconceived structure as the catalyst.
So, I give you what I wrote one year ago. For me, it still stands.
* * *
SCREW THE RULES
Jonathan Franzen is a talented writer. No question. But, Jonathan, you are not the keeper of the rules of writing. And in fact, I’m proud to say at one time or another, writing here in the shed, I have broken every single one of your “10 Rules for the Novelist.”
Franzen recently issued his ten rules in his new book of essays, The End of the End of the Earth. The list is both specific and vague, arrogant and elitist, holds half-truths, and suggests that we all would be better off working through the creative process in the exact same way. My assessment of Franzen’s list might be a bit unfair, but not entirely. You see, I am not alone. He’s being slammed by other writers all over the internet.
No real writer likes rules. Those who create within strict barriers are not truly writing, but are simply putting words next to each other to create something your English teacher in high school said fit the parameters of some arbitrary system of prose. Are there good practices for creative work? Of course. But they are your practices, certainly not everyone’s. One could argue that even grammar, at times, is arbitrary. It’s all arbitrary. If I see one more internet article that lists the dos and don’ts every writer should adhere to, or one more video lesson from a popular author about how to create a bestseller, or some university workshop that suggests it has the lesson plan for being a great writer, I will go hide in my shed for a week and have someone bring me my food.
It would be easy now to sit here at my desk and write a list of my own “rules” to counter Franzen’s. But who the hell am I to do such a thing? Franzen holds considerable weight in the publishing world. I don’t. Plus, I’d just be trolling Franzen to make myself feel better and would end up doing exactly what he’s doing. Instead, I suggest to anyone who writes, paints, sculpts, dances, plays music—respect those who do it well, consider the details of their craft, study their process, and then (BTW, this is word Franzen says a writer should never use) go do your own thing. Make your own art. Do not put yourself in their box. It’s their box. Stay out of it. In fact, stay out of boxes altogether.
Jonathan, just so you know, I have internet access in my shed, something you apparently believe a good writer should not have in his workspace. I have used the word then,. Sparingly, but I have. I’ve written in the first person (something you suggest is not the best approach for a novel), and I’m pretty sure Kafka was not an insect. You apparently believe The Metamorphosis is autobiographical. I think I know what you mean. Still, Kafka is “not a beetle” as novelist Christine Estima tweeted in response to your list.
But Jonathan, I will agree with at least one of your rules.
The reader is a friend, not an adversary, not a spectator.
Now, there’s a rule I can get behind, wholeheartedly.
I’m getting back to my writing now, Jonathan. Thanks for thinking of all of us. I’m sure you were only trying to help. But maybe the best thing you could do would be to write another wonderful novel, craft some good essays, and pen another article about birds. We know you love them.
I’ll leave you with one “rule” of my own. It is actually something Jack Kerouac once said.
Write what you want bottomless from the bottom of the mind.
That kind of says it all, don’t you think?
Photo by Cliff Johnson on Unsplash
5 thoughts on “NaNoWriMo? It’s ALWAYS Time to Write”
As a biopsychologist, I couldn’t help but think, below the brain stem is where Kerouak was thinking, but the edict I have been trying to follow fits which is, “Write what you desperately need to know.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
On my goodness, yes. I think that’s what guides me. I’m working on something now that truly is in that spirit. Thank you for this!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I look forward to reading that story and hope I bring it to my writing as well.
I’m one of those Nano loving folks. It’s helped me create a first draft for all three of my novels and is currently doing the same for #4. I think it’s helpful because it “forces” me to actually come up with a first draft which I can then edit at my own pace later on. Sure, it’s not for everyone, but I think it’s a good thing.
Sue, that is wonderful! Years ago, NaNo got me started on a project I was somewhat afraid to tackle. As you say, it “forced” me to focus. The problem I have with it lately is that it feels commercialized to me now, a kind of marketing tool for workshops and seminars and writing coaches who sometimes, through my eyes, lock writers into formulas. Nothing wrong with that for some of us. It’s just not for me anymore. I wish you the best with your writing this November!